Logo image
Board classification and managerial entrenchment: Evidence from the market for corporate control
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Board classification and managerial entrenchment: Evidence from the market for corporate control

Thomas W. Bates, David A. Becher and Michael L. Lemmon
Journal of financial economics, v 87(3), pp 656-677
01 Mar 2008
url
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.513.964View

Abstract

Business & Economics Business, Finance Economics Social Sciences
This paper considers the relation between board classification, takeover activity, and transaction outcomes for a panel of firms between 1990 and 2002. Target board classification does not change the likelihood that a firm, once targeted, is ultimately acquired. Moreover, shareholders of targets with a classified board realize bid returns that are equivalent to those of targets with a single class of directors, but receive a higher proportion of total bid surplus. Board classification does reduce the likelihood of receiving a takeover bid, however, the economic effect of bid deterrence on the value of the firm is quite small. Overall, the evidence is inconsistent with the conventional wisdom that board classification is an antitakeover device that facilitates managerial entrenchment. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Metrics

24 Record Views
129 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business, Finance
Economics
Logo image