Logo image
Body Mass Index and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Body Mass Index and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock

Maya Guglin, Elric Zweck, Manreet Kanwar, Shashank S. Sinha, Arvind Bhimaraj, Borui Li, Jacob Abraham, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Rachna Kataria, …
ASAIO journal (1992), v 70(10), pp 885-891
Oct 2024
PMID: 38527077
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002194View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Restricted

Abstract

We explored the association of body mass index (BMI) with mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS). Using the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry, we assessed the impact of BMI on mortality using restricted cubic splines in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, and race. We also assessed mortality, device use, and complications in BMI categories, defined as underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m 2 ), obese (30–39.9 kg/m 2 ), and severely obese (>40 kg/m 2 ) using univariable logistic regression models. Our cohort had 3,492 patients with CS (mean age = 62.1 ± 14 years, 69% male), 58.0% HF-related CS (HF-CS), and 27.8% acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related CS. Body mass index was a significant predictor of mortality in multivariable regression using restricted cubic splines ( p < 0.0001, p = 0.194 for nonlinearity). When stratified by categories, patients with healthy weight had lower mortality (29.0%) than obese (35.1%, p = 0.003) or severely obese (36.7%, p = 0.01). In HF-CS cohort, the healthy weight patients had the lowest mortality (21.7%), whereas it was higher in the underweight (37.5%, p = 0.012), obese (29.2%, p = 0.003), and severely obese (29.9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in mortality among BMI categories in AMI-CS.

Metrics

7 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Biomedical
Transplantation
Logo image