Logo image
CATEGORY VIABILITY: BALANCED LEVELS OF COHERENCE AND DISTINCTIVENESS
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

CATEGORY VIABILITY: BALANCED LEVELS OF COHERENCE AND DISTINCTIVENESS

Jade Y. Lo, Peer C. Fiss, Eunice Y. Rhee and Mark T. Kennedy
The Academy of Management review, v 45(1), pp 85-108
01 Jan 2020
url
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/77456View

Abstract

Business Business & Economics Management Social Sciences
In a growing body of literature on categorization in organization theory, researchers are exploring the stabilizing role of categories and the processes by which they emerge. Because the literature focuses mainly on categories that emerge successfully or are already established, we know much less about why categories fall out of use or fail to emerge. Rather than viewing declining usage or failed emergence as different processes, we argue that they are two aspects of the single problem of understanding what makes a category viable. Focusing on the coherence of the items included in a category and how distinct they are compared to items in other categories, we develop the concept of category viability and argue that viable categories are those found useful for sensemaking, analysis, and coordination because they balance both coherence and distinctiveness to fall within what we call a zone of viability. To illustrate how category viability helps explain both change and continuity of categories, we also offer a framework to describe the process by which categories move in or out of the zone of viability with deliberate actions or with shifting circumstances that change their members or positions relative to other categories.

Metrics

25 Record Views
40 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business
Management
Logo image