Logo image
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Values and Decisions—A Comparison of Health Care Professionals
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Values and Decisions—A Comparison of Health Care Professionals

Neil Farber, Joan Weiner, E Gil Boyer, Willard Green, Maureen Diamond and Irene Copare
Medical care, v 23(12), pp 1391-1398
Dec 1985
PMID: 4087953

Abstract

The authors studied the effect of various patient factors (biomedical, mental status, and psychosocial) on the decision to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation by internal medicine house staff and registered nurses. Clinical vignettes were utilized to assess the likelihood of initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by the respondents. In most cases, these factors had similar significant effects on decisions to initiate CPR by both physicians and nurses. However, some differences in the likelihood of performing CPR were found between the physician and nurse populations, particularly in the areas of mental status and institutionalization. Dementia, mental retardation, and nursing home status all caused residents to be significantly less likely to initiate CPR than nurses (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that biomedical, mental status, and psychosocial patient factors have a significant impact on the decision to initiate CPR by both internal medicine residents and nurses. These decisions apparently are rooted in similar criteria, although the basis for the differences between the two groups warrants further study.

Metrics

10 Record Views
13 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image