Journal article
Clinical Signs to Categorize Shock and Target Vasoactive Medications in Warm Versus Cold Pediatric Septic Shock
Pediatric critical care medicine, v 21(12), pp 1051-1058
Dec 2020
PMID: 32740190
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Determine level of agreement among clinical signs of shock type, identify which signs clinicians prioritize to determine shock type and select vasoactive medications, and test the association of shock type-vasoactive mismatch with prolonged organ dysfunction or death (complicated course).
Retrospective observational study.
Single large academic PICU.
Patients less than 18 years treated on a critical care sepsis pathway between 2012 and 2016.
None.
Agreement among clinical signs (extremity temperature, capillary refill, pulse strength, pulse pressure, and diastolic blood pressure) was measured using Fleiss and Cohen's κ. Association of clinical signs with shock type and shock type-vasoactive mismatch (e.g., cold shock treated with vasopressor rather than inotrope) with complicated course was determined using multivariable logistic regression. Of 469 patients, clinicians determined 307 (65%) had warm and 162 (35%) had cold shock. Agreement across all clinical signs was low (κ, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.30), although agreement between extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength was better than with pulse pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Only extremity temperature (adjusted odds ratio, 26.6; 95% CI, 15.5-45.8), capillary refill (adjusted odds ratio, 15.7; 95% CI, 7.9-31.3), and pulse strength (adjusted odds ratio, 21.3; 95% CI, 8.6-52.7) were associated with clinician-documented shock type. Of the 86 patients initiated on vasoactive medications during the pathway, shock type was discordant from vasoactive medication (κ, 0.14; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.31) and shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.02).
Agreement was low among common clinical signs used to characterize shock type, with clinicians prioritizing extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength. Although clinician-assigned shock type was often discordant with vasoactive choice, shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course. Categorizing shock based on clinical signs should be done cautiously.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Clinical Signs to Categorize Shock and Target Vasoactive Medications in Warm Versus Cold Pediatric Septic Shock
- Creators
- Sarah B Walker - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaThomas W Conlon - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBingqing Zhang - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaJanell L Mensinger - Drexel UniversityJulie C Fitzgerald - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAdam S Himebauch - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaChristie Glau - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAkira Nishisaki - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuchitra Ranjit - Critical Care, Apollo Children's Hospital, Chennai, India.Vinay Nadkarni - Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaScott L Weiss - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Publication Details
- Pediatric critical care medicine, v 21(12), pp 1051-1058
- Publisher
- Lippincott
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000596383000005
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85097371065
- Other Identifier
- 991019357638704721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pediatrics