Logo image
Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities

Alec M. Chan-Golston, Scott Friedlander, Deborah C. Glik, Michael L. Prelip, Thomas R. Belin, Ron Brookmeyer, Robert Santos, Jie Chen and Alexander N. Ortega
Progress in community health partnerships, v 10(3), pp 435-442
01 Sep 2016
PMID: 28230551
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc5327843View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Background: The employment of professional interviewers from academic survey centers to conduct surveys has been standard practice. Because one goal of community-engaged research is to provide professional skills to community residents, this paper considers whether employing locally trained lay interviewers from within the community may be as effective as employing interviewers from an academic survey center with regard to unit and item nonresponse rates and cost. Methods: To study a nutrition-focused intervention, 1035 in-person household interviews were conducted in East Los Angeles and Boyle Heights, 503 of which were completed by lay community interviewers. A chi-square test was used to assess differences in unit nonresponse rates between professional and community interviewers and Welch's t tests were used to assess differences in item nonresponse rates. A cost comparison analysis between the two interviewer groups was also conducted. Results: Interviewers from the academic survey center had lower unit nonresponse rates than the lay community interviewers (16.2% vs. 23.3%; p < 0.01). However, the item nonresponse rates were lower for the community interviewers than the professional interviewers (1.4% vs. 3.3%;p < 0.01). Community interviewers cost approximately $415.38 per survey whereas professional interviewers cost approximately $537.29 per survey. Conclusions: With a lower cost per completed survey and lower item nonresponse rates, lay community interviewers are a viable alternative to professional interviewers for fieldwork in community-based research. Additional research is needed to assess other important aspects of data quality interviewer such as interviewer effects and response error.

Metrics

16 Record Views
1 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image