Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities
Alec M. Chan-Golston, Scott Friedlander, Deborah C. Glik, Michael L. Prelip, Thomas R. Belin, Ron Brookmeyer, Robert Santos, Jie Chen and Alexander N. Ortega
Progress in community health partnerships, v 10(3), pp 435-442
Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Background: The employment of professional interviewers from academic survey centers to conduct surveys has been standard practice. Because one goal of community-engaged research is to provide professional skills to community residents, this paper considers whether employing locally trained lay interviewers from within the community may be as effective as employing interviewers from an academic survey center with regard to unit and item nonresponse rates and cost.
Methods: To study a nutrition-focused intervention, 1035 in-person household interviews were conducted in East Los Angeles and Boyle Heights, 503 of which were completed by lay community interviewers. A chi-square test was used to assess differences in unit nonresponse rates between professional and community interviewers and Welch's t tests were used to assess differences in item nonresponse rates. A cost comparison analysis between the two interviewer groups was also conducted.
Results: Interviewers from the academic survey center had lower unit nonresponse rates than the lay community interviewers (16.2% vs. 23.3%; p < 0.01). However, the item nonresponse rates were lower for the community interviewers than the professional interviewers (1.4% vs. 3.3%;p < 0.01). Community interviewers cost approximately $415.38 per survey whereas professional interviewers cost approximately $537.29 per survey.
Conclusions: With a lower cost per completed survey and lower item nonresponse rates, lay community interviewers are a viable alternative to professional interviewers for fieldwork in community-based research. Additional research is needed to assess other important aspects of data quality interviewer such as interviewer effects and response error.
Metrics
16 Record Views
1 citations in Scopus
Details
Title
Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities
Creators
Alec M. Chan-Golston - University of California at Los Angeles
Scott Friedlander - University of California at Los Angeles
Deborah C. Glik - University of California at Los Angeles
Michael L. Prelip - University of California at Los Angeles
Thomas R. Belin - University of California at Los Angeles
Ron Brookmeyer - Bloomberg
Robert Santos - Urban Institute
Jie Chen - University of Maryland, College Park
Alexander N. Ortega - Drexel University
Publication Details
Progress in community health partnerships, v 10(3), pp 435-442
Publisher
Johns Hopkins Univ Press
Number of pages
8
Grant note
R25HL108854 / NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI)
P30MH058107 / NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
P50 HL105188; R25 HL108854 / National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Health Management and Policy
Web of Science ID
WOS:000387632800010
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84994793899
Other Identifier
991019168355504721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: