Logo image
Comparison of Observed Infiltration Rates of Different Permeable Urban Surfaces Using a Cornell Sprinkle Infiltrometer
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Comparison of Observed Infiltration Rates of Different Permeable Urban Surfaces Using a Cornell Sprinkle Infiltrometer

Bita Alizadehtazi, Kimberly DiGiovanni, Romano Foti, Tatiana Morin, Nandan H Shetty, Franco A Montalto and Patrick L Gurian
Journal of hydrologic engineering, v 21(7)
01 Jul 2016

Abstract

Technical Note Technical Notes
AbstractEfforts to retrofit pervious surfaces into urban landscapes are ongoing, yet the in situ infiltration rates of such surfaces have not been adequately studied. Of increasing interest in urban stormwater management is whether the infiltration rates of different permeable surfaces can be reliably estimated based on surface type alone. To this aim, a total of 139 infiltration tests were conducted using a Cornell sprinkle infiltrometer at 39 different sites distributed within New York City and Philadelphia. The results show significant statistical differences among surfaces: urban parks and tree pits without guards have the lowest infiltration rates; vegetated courtyards, tree pits with guards, porous pavers, backyards, and bioretention facilities display moderate infiltration rates; and porous concrete has the highest infiltration rate. The infiltration rates measured for most of the sites are similar or greater than the local design storm, suggesting that minimal rainfall excess would be generated from these surfaces as long as sufficient subsurface storage space is available.

Metrics

27 Record Views
26 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#6 Clean Water and Sanitation
#13 Climate Action
#2 Zero Hunger
#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
#14 Life Below Water

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Civil
Environmental Sciences
Water Resources
Logo image