Logo image
Comparison of chest radiograph and lung ultrasound in children with acute respiratory failure
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparison of chest radiograph and lung ultrasound in children with acute respiratory failure

Ryan L. Desanti, Kara G. Gill, Jonathan O. Swanson, Pierre D. Kory, Jessica Schmidt, Eileen A. Cowan, Michael R. Lasarev and Awni M. Al-Subu
Journal of ultrasound
25 Sep 2023
PMID: 37747593
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632347View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Science & Technology
Purpose Chest x-ray (CXR) is the standard imaging used to evaluate children in acute respiratory distress and failure. Our objective was to compare the lung-imaging techniques of CXR and lung ultrasound (LUS) in the evaluation of children with acute respiratory failure (ARF) to quantify agreement and to determine which technique identified a higher frequency of pulmonary abnormalities.Methods This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of LUS in children with ARF from 12/2018 to 02/2020 completed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (USA). Children > 37.0 weeks corrected gestational age and = 18 years of age admitted to the PICU with ARF were evaluated with LUS. We compared CXR and LUS completed within 6 h of each other. Kappa statistics (k) adjusted for maximum attainable agreement (k/k(max)) were used to quantify agreement between imaging techniques and descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency of abnormalities.Results Eighty-eight children had LUS completed, 32 with concomitant imaging completed within 6 h are included. There was fair agreement between LUS and CXR derived diagnoses with 58% agreement (k/k(max) = 0.36). Evaluation of imaging patterns included: normal, 57% agreement (k = 0.032); interstitial pattern, 47% agreement (k = 0.003); and consolidation, 65% agreement (k = 0.29). CXR identified more imaging abnormalities than LUS.Conclusions There is fair agreement between CXR and LUS-derived diagnoses in children with ARF. Given this, clinicians should consider the benefits and limitations of specific imaging modalities when evaluating children with ARF. Additional studies are necessary to further define the role of LUS in pediatric ARF given the small sample size of our study.

Metrics

8 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image