Logo image
Competing Mistresses? Academic Vs. Practitioner Perceptions of Systems Analysis
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Competing Mistresses? Academic Vs. Practitioner Perceptions of Systems Analysis

Murugan Anandarajan and Susan K. Lippert
The Journal of computer information systems, v 46(5), pp 114-126
01 Jun 2006

Abstract

academic research correspondence analysis practitioner research System planning systems analysis
This study investigates whether a gap exists between academic and practitioner-oriented research within the domain of systems planning and analysis. Academic-oriented research is rooted in positivism, which assumes that knowledge is objective and independent from the knower. Practitioner-oriented research assumes that knowledge is a social construction - the meanings and values which constitute knowledge are inseparable from the knower. The research questions include: (1) what are the similarities and differences between academic and practitioner research within systems planning and analysis? (2) in which streams do gaps exist? (3) to what extent do themes emerge from the data? and (4) what are the differences in research focus, pre- and post-1990, between academics and practitioners? The findings suggest that differences do exist between academic- and practitioner- oriented research regarding what is studied, which research methods are employed, and what outcomes arise from the specific studies. These differences in research appear to rest in the ideological foundations in which each is focused.

Metrics

9 Record Views
7 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Information Systems
Logo image