Journal article
Compliance and credibility: a critique of the sexual assault forensic examination from international perspectives
Gender and Justice, v 1(1), pp 119-139
Mar 2025
Abstract
The forensic medical examination is often lauded as an effective intervention to reduce case attrition by providing evidence that supports a rape or sexual assault complaint. We show that, despite nearly universal enthusiasm for such programmes, the examination also serves as an extra-legal opportunity for criminal justice and medical personnel to assess the credibility of rape and sexual assault complainants. Drawing on five case studies from three countries, we investigate the medico-legal exam as a complicated process that helps shape case outcomes often in ways unanticipated by proponents of forensic medical examinations. We argue that through co-optation of language about choice, consent, and empowerment, and despite significant variation in procedures, protocols, and legal rules, personnel involved with the medico-legal process often use it to impose formal and informal ‘tests’ for assessing complainant credibility and to dismiss or cast doubt upon some rape and sexual assault reports.
Metrics
13 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Compliance and credibility: a critique of the sexual assault forensic examination from international perspectives
- Creators
- Lesley McMillan - Glasgow Caledonian UniversityRose Corrigan - Drexel UniversitySameena Mulla - Emory UniversityGethin Rees - Newcastle UniversityDeborah White - Trent University
- Publication Details
- Gender and Justice, v 1(1), pp 119-139
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Politics; Thomas R. Kline School of Law
- Other Identifier
- 991022040510204721