Logo image
Compliance of Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Compliance of Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports

SCIENCE EDITING, v 7(1)
Feb 2020
url
https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Purpose: The Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing are of increasing importance in an open science environment as a way to increase the transparency and quality of academic society journals. However, little previous research has investigated the application of this new guideline in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which this guideline is being applied by Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports. Methods: The researchers investigated the homepages of 59 Korean academic society-published journals to evaluate whether they had adopted the 33 items listed in the guideline. Based on the information available on the journals' homepages, each item was classified as 'yes' or 'no' within the four categories of basic journal information, publication ethics, copyright and archiving information, and profit model. Results: The basic journal information category was generally well-practiced, with the exceptions of the peer review process, readership, and author fees. The copyright and licensing information category was also well-practiced, with the exception of policies on posting accepted articles with third parties and archiving items. However, most items in the publication ethics category were not well practiced, with the exception of authorship and intellectual property. All items in the profit model category were infrequently implemented. Conclusion: These findings serve as a good indicator for Korean journal editors of areas for improvement. It may be helpful to review journals' publication policies and homepages to comply with international publishing standards.

Metrics

15 Record Views
9 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Communication
Logo image