Logo image
Contaminant dust suppression materials: A cost-effectiveness estimation methodology
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Contaminant dust suppression materials: A cost-effectiveness estimation methodology

Hilary I. Inyang, Sunyoung Bae and Miguel A. Pando
Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation, v 93, pp 563-571
01 Nov 2016

Abstract

Cost effectiveness Dust control Dust suppressant Polymer solutions Soil desiccation
Chemical dust suppressants generally require more than one application to exposed ground surfaces to maintain the soil wetness level required to reduce dust emissions under the combined action of wind, high ambient temperature, low relative humidity, and vehicular traffic. A quantitative methodology is herein formulated for estimation of the cost-effectiveness of dust suppression with chemical agents within a specified construction duration. This is applied to the 3 polymers: sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC A), polyacrylamide (PAM B) and polyethylene oxide (PEO A) used on 2 base soils (sodium montmorillonite (Na-montmorillonite) and kaolinite (K)). Polymer aqueous concentrations ranging from 0.5g/L to 10g/L, with distilled water as control, were used to perform desiccation tests at 25°C and 30% relative humidity. The results show that liquid loss kinetics alone which indicated CMC A at 8g/L and 4g/L aqueous concentrations for Na-montmorillonite during 891h and kaolinite during 696h, respectively, may not provide complete information on the potential cost-effectiveness of dust suppressants over multiple applications in the field. It identifies water and PAM B at <0.1g/L as the cost effective for Na-montmorillonite with PEO A, water and PAM B at similarly low concentrations are the most cost effective for kaolinite.

Metrics

7 Record Views
23 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Multidisciplinary
Instruments & Instrumentation
Logo image