Logo image
Cost-effectiveness of achieving clinical improvement with a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Cost-effectiveness of achieving clinical improvement with a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program

Laura Akers, Paul Rohde, Eric Stice, Meghan L Butryn and Heather Shaw
Eating disorders, v 25(3), pp 263-272
May 2017
PMID: 28287919
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc6204073View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Adolescent Adult Body Image Cognitive Dissonance Cost-Benefit Analysis Feeding and Eating Disorders - economics Feeding and Eating Disorders - prevention & control Female Humans Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Psychotherapy - economics Psychotherapy - methods Young Adult
Using data from an effectiveness trial delivered by college clinicians, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the dissonance-based Body Project program for reducing eating disorder symptoms in women with body dissatisfaction. The outcome of interest was individual-level change; 14.9% of Body Project participants attained clinically meaningful improvement vs. 6.7% of controls. Delivering the intervention costs approximately $70 (2012 U.S. dollars) per person. Incremental cost-effectiveness was $838 for each additional at-risk person reducing eating disorder symptomology to a clinically meaningful degree. These analyses demonstrate the economic value of the Body Project for college-age women with symptoms below the eating disorder diagnosis threshold.

Metrics

10 Record Views
11 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Psychology
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image