Logo image
Back
Crowdsourcing Undone Science
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Crowdsourcing Undone Science

Gwen Ottinger
Engaging science, technology, and society, v 3, pp 560-574
01 Jan 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.124
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
url
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.124View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

Social Issues Social Sciences
Could crowdsourcing be a way to get undone science done? Could grassroots groups enlist volunteers to help make sense of large amounts of otherwise unanalyzed data-an approach that has been gaining popularity among natural scientists? This paper assesses the viability of this technique for creating new knowledge about the local effects of petrochemicals, by examining three recent experiments in crowdsourcing led by non-profits and grassroots groups. These case studies suggest that undertaking a crowdsourcing project requires significant resources, including technological infrastructures that smaller or more informal groups may find it difficult to provide. They also indicate that crowdsourcing will be most successful when the questions of grassroots groups line up fairly well with existing scientific frameworks. The paper concludes that further experimentation in crowdsourcing is warranted, at least in cases where adequate resources and interpretive frameworks are available, and that further investment in technological infrastructures for data analysis is needed.

Metrics

10 Record Views
16 citations in Web of Science

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Social Issues
Logo image