Journal article
Demographic and Sexual Behavior Comparisons of Indian and U.S. Internet Samples of Men who have Sex with Men
International journal of sexual health, v 23(2), pp 90-101
01 Apr 2011
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Data were collected via the Internet on sexual behaviors of Indian men who have sex with men (MSM; n = 171); these data were compared to online American MSM (n = 682). Among Indian MSM, 51% had never been tested for HIV, 100% believed themselves to be HIV-uninfected, and 22% (secondary Internet male partners) to 43% (primary male partners) reported not using condoms during last anal intercourse. While U.S. MSM were more likely to not use condoms (42% for secondary Internet partners to 67% for primary male partners), most (88%) had been tested for HIV (.0001 ≤ p ≤ .002, all comparisons). Low rates of HIV testing, beliefs about being HIV-uninfected, and significant levels of unsafe anal intercourse could fuel the spread of infection among Indian MSM.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Demographic and Sexual Behavior Comparisons of Indian and U.S. Internet Samples of Men who have Sex with Men
- Creators
- Seth Welles - Drexel UniversityMichael Ross - The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonSwagata Banik - Cleveland State UniversityLeslie Fisher - Cleveland State UniversityMary McFarlane - Centers for Disease Control and PreventionRachel Kachur - Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCornelis Rietmeijer - Denver Public HealthDonald Allensworth-Davies - Boston University
- Publication Details
- International journal of sexual health, v 23(2), pp 90-101
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis Group
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000291864500002
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-79959192881
- Other Identifier
- 991019167953504721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Psychology, Clinical
- Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
- Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary