Logo image
Description as art and (social) science
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Description as art and (social) science

Carolyn E. Holmes, Michelle Jurkovich, Meg K Guliford and Mary Anne S. Mendoza-Davé
International Politics, Forthcoming
26 Aug 2026
Featured in Collection :   Drexel's Newest Publications
url
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00766-5View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2026 Open CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Political Geography Political Science Political Sociology Political Theory
Everyone studying the social and political world engages in description, at some level, as a central part of the social scientific process. Whether in conceptualization, data collection, or the curation of cases of interest, the task of understanding who, what, when, where, and how politics moves and operates is central to political science inquiry. Of course, the use of description by scholars of different epistemological persuasions leaves it ripe for disagreement on how the exercise can best be done. In this special issue, we do not ignore those differences but rather draw attention to the many commitments and motivations that are shared by descriptive scholars across diverse epistemological commitments. Ultimately, we find the current descriptive renaissance remarkable in its ability to bring together scholars across varied subfields, epistemological, methodological, and ontological priors and preferences.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image