Journal article
Developing a typology of the roles public contributors undertake to establish legitimacy: a longitudinal case study of patient and public involvement in a health network
BMJ open, v 10(5), pp e033370-e033370
18 May 2020
PMID: 32430448
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
To identify how public contributors established their legitimacy in the functioning of a patient and public involvement programme at a health network.
A longitudinal case study with three embedded units (projects) involving public contributors. Interviews (n=24), observations (n=27) and documentary data collection occurred over 16 months.
The West of England Academic Health Science Network (WEAHSN), 1 of 15 regional AHSNs in England.
Interviews were conducted with public contributors (n=5) and professionals (n=19) who were staff from the WEAHSN, its member organisations and its partners.
Public contributors established their legitimacy by using nine distinct roles: (1) lived experience, as a patient or carer; (2) occupational knowledge, offering job-related expertise; (3) occupational skills, offering aptitude developed through employment; (4) patient advocate, promoting the interests of patients; (5) keeper of the public purse, encouraging wise spending; (6) intuitive public, piloting materials suitable for the general public; (7) fresh-eyed reviewer, critiquing materials; (8) critical friend, critiquing progress and proposing new initiatives and (9) boundary spanner, urging professionals to work across organisations. Individual public contributors occupied many, but not all, of the roles.
Lived experience is only one of nine distinct public contributor roles. The WEAHSN provided a benign context for the study because in a health network public contributors are one of many parties seeking to establish legitimacy through finding valuable roles. The nine roles can be organised into a typology according to whether the basis for legitimacy lies in: the public contributor's knowledge, skills and experience; citizenship through the aspiration to achieve a broad public good; or being an outsider. The typology shows how public contributors can be involved in work where lived experience appears to lack relevance: strategic decision making; research unconnected to particular conditions; or acute service delivery.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Developing a typology of the roles public contributors undertake to establish legitimacy: a longitudinal case study of patient and public involvement in a health network
- Creators
- Jacqueline Barker - University of the West of EnglandPam Moule - University of the West of EnglandDavid Evans - University of the West of EnglandWendy Phillips - University of the West of EnglandNick Leggett - ORCID
- Publication Details
- BMJ open, v 10(5), pp e033370-e033370
- Publisher
- British Medical Journal (BMJ)
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- College of Medicine; Pharmacology and Physiology; Drexel University
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000738373200024
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85084963485
- Other Identifier
- 991020100065004721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- Medicine, General & Internal