Logo image
Development of an Instrument to Assess Work Productivity in Individuals With Voice Disorders: The Work Hoarse
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Development of an Instrument to Assess Work Productivity in Individuals With Voice Disorders: The Work Hoarse

Qiubei Zhu, Amanda Hu, John Paul Giliberto, Samantha Carlson, Samantha Jensen, Ryan Tiu and Tanya K. Meyer
Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology, v 128(1), pp 5-12
01 Jan 2019
PMID: 30311497
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418803961View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Otorhinolaryngology Science & Technology
Objectives: Vocal function is critical to employability in the modern era. Although research clearly demonstrates that a disordered voice affects quality of life, few studies have attempted to quantitate the effects of a disordered voice on work productivity. The Voice-Related Statements battery, which originally had 20 items, was previously developed to qualitatively describe how an individual's dysphonia affects his or her job performance. The aim of this study was to refine and reduce the item number and provide preliminary validation of this shortened instrument. Methods: The Voice-Related Statements instrument was administered to employed patients with dysphonia in conjunction with 2 additional instruments: the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Response distributions and intercorrelations were examined for item reduction. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on retained items. Correlations were performed with other voice-related instruments. Reliability was tested using a coefficient of stability. Results: One hundred seventy-four employed patients with dysphonia were enrolled in this study. Six items were removed because of redundancy, factor analysis, and cognitive interview results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 1-factor structure explaining 66.28% of the total variance. The final 8-item instrument demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.93), with a moderately robust correlation with the VHI (r = 0.68, P < .001) and WPAI work impairment measures (r = 0.63, P < .001). The VHI showed a much weaker correlation with WPAI work impairment (r = 0.48, P < .001). Test-retest reliability was good (0.83, P < .01). Conclusions: An 8-item instrument to qualitatively measure the impact of a disordered voice at work has been developed and is called the Work Hoarse. This instrument is a better measure of voice-related work productivity impairment than the VHI and will augment quantitative work productivity instruments that are currently available.

Metrics

5 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Otorhinolaryngology
Logo image