Logo image
Back
'Did Not Finish': A Phenomenology of Failure
Journal article   Peer reviewed

'Did Not Finish': A Phenomenology of Failure

Tim Gorichanaz
Sport, ethics and philosophy, v 15(1), pp 27-42
02 Jan 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2019.1669694
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel

Abstract

Failure Heidegger phenomenology running ultramarathon
This paper explores what it means to fail in an ultramarathon-be marked DNF, or Did Not Finish-through hermeneutic phenomenology. In today's popular culture, failure holds a paradoxical position: Particularly in the 'startup' ethos, failure is touted as a good, but only because it brings one closer to success. On a Heideggerian perspective, this is an inauthentic understanding of failure. This paper proposes that sport, and specifically ultrarunning, is a site for an authentic understanding of failure-and, consonantly, success. The notion of death is a major consideration: Though death is often described as a kind of failure, it is better understood phenomenologically as that which reveals and focuses one's authentic possibilities for success. Failure, on the other hand, is a cutting-off of possibility. Three types of DNF can be discerned, corresponding to a cutting-off in the past, present and future, respectively. In ultrarunning, an athlete exists as being-toward-death, and finishing belongs to the athlete as part of their self and world. When a DNF happens, an athlete is suddenly rendered incomplete, worldless. This is a jarring, painful experience, from which it takes time and effort, and a reconstruction of self, to recover.

Metrics

9 Record Views
8 citations in Web of Science
5 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Ethics
Logo image