Logo image
Disciplinary differences of software use and impact in scientific literature
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Disciplinary differences of software use and impact in scientific literature

Xuelian Pan, Erjia Yan and Weina Hua
Scientometrics, v 109(3), pp 1593-1610
Dec 2016

Abstract

Citation analysis Digital outputs Software citation Computer Science Information Storage and Retrieval Entity citation Library Science Scientific software
Software plays an important role in the advancement of science. Software developers, users, and funding agencies have deep interests in the impact of software on science. This study investigates the use and impact of software by examining how software is mentioned and cited among 9548 articles published in PLOS ONE in 12 defined disciplines. Our results demonstrate that software is widely used in scientific research and a substantial uncitedness of software exists across different disciplines. Findings also show that the practice of software citations varies noticeably at the discipline level and software that is free for academic use is more likely to receive citations than commercial software.

Metrics

12 Record Views
31 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
Information Science & Library Science
Logo image