Logo image
Do Group and Organizational Identification Help or Hurt Intergroup Strategic Consensus?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Do Group and Organizational Identification Help or Hurt Intergroup Strategic Consensus?

Jeanine Pieternel Porck, Daan van Knippenberg, Murat Tarakci, Nuefer Yasin Ates, Patrick J. F. Groenen and Marco de Haas
Journal of management, v 46(2)
01 Feb 2020
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318788434View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Business Business & Economics Management Psychology Psychology, Applied Social Sciences
Implementing strategy demands an organizationwide effort, where teams should not operate in isolation. A challenge many organizations face in implementing their strategy is eradicating silo thinking and creating shared understanding of strategy between interdependent teams-that is, intergroup strategic consensus. However, strategy process research is silent on how such intergroup strategic consensus can emerge. Drawing on social identity theory, we offer a lens to understand what influences the degree of intergroup strategic consensus. We unveil a tension between organizational and group identification such that organizational identification enhances intergroup strategic consensus, whereas group identification reduces it. Moreover, we hypothesize that high group identification crowds out positive effects of organizational identification on intergroup strategic consensus. Data from 451 intergroup relationships between 92 teams within a service organization support these hypotheses. We replicate our results using 191 intergroup relationships between 37 teams from another organization. These results allow us to develop an understanding of intergroup strategic consensus, expand the conversation in strategy process research to between-team interdependencies, and challenge the assumption in management literature and practice that higher identification is always desirable.

Metrics

10 Record Views
49 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business
Management
Psychology, Applied
Logo image