Logo image
Does attrition during follow-up bias outcome data in studies of eating disorders?
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Does attrition during follow-up bias outcome data in studies of eating disorders?

Amy M Neeren, Meghan L Butryn, Michael R Lowe, Antonia P O'Planick, Doug W Bunnell and Susan M Ice
Eating behaviors : an international journal, v 11(1), pp 40-44
2010
PMID: 19962119

Abstract

Attrition Eating disorders
Attrition is a pervasive problem in eating disorders research. This study examined whether those who do and do not respond to follow-up assessments differ before or during treatment. Participants ( N = 268) receiving residential eating disorders treatment were categorized according to those who did (“responders,” n = 152) and did not (“non-responders,” n = 116) complete a one-month follow-up assessment. Among participants diagnosed with bulimia nervosa ( n = 136), responders exhibited significantly higher scores than non-responders at intake on restraint, weight concern, eating concerns, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, and depressive symptoms, and had significantly less improvement in eating concerns during treatment. Among participants with anorexia nervosa ( n = 132), there were no significant differences between responders and non-responders at intake or in treatment improvement. Research on bulimia nervosa treatment based on responders to follow-up assessments may underestimate the amount of improvement that patients experience.

Metrics

10 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image