Dosimetric comparison study between intensity modulated radiation therapy and three‐dimensional conformal proton therapy for pelvic bone marrow sparing in the treatment of cervical cancer
William Y. Song, Soon N. Huh, Yun Liang, Greg White, R. Charles Nichols, W. Tyler Watkins, Arno J. Mundt and Loren K. Mell
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v 11(4), pp 83-92
The objective was to compare intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 3D conformal proton therapy (3DCPT) in the treatment of cervical cancer. In particular, each technique's ability to spare pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was of primary interest in this study. A total of six cervical cancer patients (3 postoperative and 3 intact) were planned and analyzed. All plans had uniform 1.0 cm CTV‐PTV margin and satisfied the 95% PTV with 100% isodose (prescription
dose
=
45
Gy
) coverage. Dose‐volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed for comparison. The overall PTV and PBM volumes were
1035.9
±
192.2
cc and
1151.4
±
198.3
cc, respectively. In terms of PTV dose conformity index (DCI) and dose homogeneity index (DHI), 3DCPT was slightly superior to IMRT with
1.00
±
0.001
,
1.01
±
0.02
, and
1.10
±
0.02
,
1.13
±
0.01
, respectively. In addition, 3DCPT demonstrated superiority in reducing lower doses (i.e., V30 or less) to PBM, small bowel and bladder. Particularly in PBM, average V10 and V20 reductions of 10.8% and
7.4
%
(
p
=
0.001
and 0.04), respectively, were observed. However, in the higher dose range, IMRT provided better sparing
(
>
V
30
)
. For example, in small bowel and PBM, average reductions in V45 of 4.9% and
10.0
%
(
p
=
0.048
and 0.008), respectively, were observed. Due to its physical characteristics such as low entrance dose, spread‐out Bragg peak and finite particle range of protons, 3DCPT illustrated superior target coverage uniformity and sparing of the lower doses in PBM and other organs. Further studies are, however, needed to fully exploit the benefits of protons for general use in cervical cancer.
PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dk
Dosimetric comparison study between intensity modulated radiation therapy and three‐dimensional conformal proton therapy for pelvic bone marrow sparing in the treatment of cervical cancer
Creators
William Y. Song - University of California San Diego
Soon N. Huh - University of Florida
Yun Liang - University of California San Diego
Greg White - University of California San Diego
R. Charles Nichols - University of Florida
W. Tyler Watkins - University of California San Diego
Arno J. Mundt - University of California San Diego
Loren K. Mell - University of California San Diego
Publication Details
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v 11(4), pp 83-92
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Radiation Oncology (and Nuclear Medicine)
Web of Science ID
WOS:000284215700009
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-78650067776
Other Identifier
991021897493004721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: