Logo image
Effect of Medicare Advantage on health care use and care dissatisfaction in mental illness
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Effect of Medicare Advantage on health care use and care dissatisfaction in mental illness

Sungchul Park
Health services research, v 57(4), pp 820-829
17 Feb 2022
PMID: 35124801
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13945View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Health Care Sciences & Services Health Policy & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology
Objective To examine the effects of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment on health care use and dissatisfaction with care received among Medicare beneficiaries with mental illness. Data Sources I identified traditional Medicare (TM) and MA beneficiaries with mental illness using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey for 2012-2016. Study Design I included two types of outcomes: four measures of health care use and 10 measures of care dissatisfaction. My primary independent variable was enrollment in TM versus MA. To address selective enrollment into MA, I used an instrumental variable (IV) approach. Following prior research, I decomposed the MA benchmark into exogenous and endogenous components and then used the exogenous component as my instrument. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Not Applicable. Principal Findings IV analyses showed that compared with TM enrollment, MA enrollment significantly decreased outpatient hospital visits and medical provider visits by 6.73 (95% CI: -12.10 to -1.36) and 36.48 (95% CI: -52.67 to -20.28). However, there were no significant changes in inpatient hospital admissions and prescription drug purchases. Compared with TM enrollment, MA enrollment significantly increased dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket expenses by 25.51 percentage points (95% CI: 0.43 to 50.60). However, there were no significant changes in other measures of care dissatisfaction in terms of access to care, quality of care, and prescription medication. Conclusions These findings suggest that MA enrollment may lead to low health care use among those with mental illness, indicating efficient care delivery. Also, MA enrollment may not preclude those with mental illness from accessing needed care. However, high dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket expenses among MA beneficiaries may imply the use of out-of-network providers. Further research is warranted to investigate whether high dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket expenses may be attributable to MA's narrow networks for mental services.

Metrics

5 Record Views
9 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Logo image