Logo image
Effect of Pooled Comparative Information on Judgments of Quality
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Effect of Pooled Comparative Information on Judgments of Quality

Leigh A Baumgart, Ellen J Bass, John D Voss and Jason A Lyman
IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, v 45(6), pp 773-781
Dec 2015
PMID: 26949581
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4776339View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Accuracy Decision support Decision support systems judgment analysis (JA) Quality assessment quality improvement
Quality assessment is the focus of many healthcare initiatives. Yet, it is not well understood how the type of information used in decision support tools to enable judgments of quality based on data impacts the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of judgments made by physicians. Comparative pooled information could allow physicians to judge the quality of their practice by making comparisons with other practices or other specific populations of patients. In this study, resident physicians were provided with varying types of information derived from pooled patient datasets: quality component measures at the individual and group level, a qualitative interpretation of the quality measures using percentile rank, and an aggregate composite quality score. Thirty-two participants viewed 30 quality profiles consisting of information applicable to the practice of 30 deidentified resident physicians. Those provided with quality component measures and a qualitative interpretation of the quality measures (rankings) judged quality of care more similarly to experts and were more internally consistent compared with participants who were provided with quality component measures alone. Reliability between participants was significantly less for those who were provided with a composite quality score compared with those who were not.

Metrics

6 Record Views
2 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science, Cybernetics
Logo image