General & Internal Medicine Health Care Sciences & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, General & Internal Science & Technology
BACKGROUND: Lower socioeconomic status is associated with excess disease burden from diabetes. Diabetes self-management support interventions are needed that are effective in engaging lower income patients, addressing competing life priorities and barriers to self-care, and facilitating behavior change.
OBJECTIVE: To pilot test feasibility, acceptability, and effect on disease control of a problem-based diabetes self-management training adapted for low literacy and accessibility.
DESIGN: Two-arm randomized controlled trial powered to detect a 0.50% change in A1C at follow-up with a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 in a pooled analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six urban African-American patients with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal blood sugar, blood pressure, or cholesterol control recruited from a diabetes registry within a university-affiliated managed care organization.
INTERVENTIONS: A group, problem-based diabetes self-management training designed for delivery in an intensive and a condensed program format. Three intensive and three condensed program groups were conducted during the trial.
MAIN MEASURES: Clinical (A1C, systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], LDL and HDL cholesterol) and behavioral (knowledge, problem solving, self-management behavior) data were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention (corresponding with 6-9 months following baseline).
RESULTS: Adoption of both programs was high (> 85% attendance rates, 95% retention). At 3 months post-intervention, the between-group difference in A1C change was -0.72% (p = 0.02), in favor of the intensive program. A1C reduction was partially mediated by problem-solving skill at follow-up ( = -0.13, p = 0.04). Intensive program patients demonstrated within-group improvements in knowledge (p < 0.001), problem-solving (p = 0.01), and self-management behaviors (p = 0.04). Among the subsets of patients with suboptimal blood pressure or lipids at baseline, the intensive program yielded clinically significant individual improvements in SBP, DBP, and LDL cholesterol. Patient satisfaction and usability ratings were high for both programs.
CONCLUSIONS: A literacy-adapted, intensive, problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training was effective for key clinical and behavioral outcomes in a lower income patient sample.
Effect of Problem-Solving-Based Diabetes Self-Management Training on Diabetes Control in a Low Income Patient Sample
Creators
Felicia Hill-Briggs - Johns Hopkins University
Mariana Lazo - Bloomberg (United States)
Mark Peyrot - Loyola University Maryland
Angela Doswell - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Yi-Ting Chang - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Martha N. Hill - Johns Hopkins University
David Levine - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Nae-Yuh Wang - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Frederick L. Brancati - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Publication Details
Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, v 26(9), pp 972-978
Publisher
Springer Nature
Number of pages
7
Grant note
K01 HL076644 / NHLBI; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI)
P60 DK079637 / NIDDK Diabetes Research and Training Center; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
M01RR000052 / NIH National Center for Research Resources; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
7-06-IN-07 / American Diabetes Association
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Urban Health Collaborative
Web of Science ID
WOS:000294013700009
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-80052303104
Other Identifier
991020550343104721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: