Logo image
Effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence of people living with dementia: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, controlled trial
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence of people living with dementia: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, controlled trial

Yun-Hee Jeon, Judy Simpson, Judith Fethney, Luisa Krein, Mirim Shin, Lee-Fay Low, Robert T. Woods, Loren Mowszowski, Sarah Hilmer, Sharon L. Naismith, …
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, v 96(7), pp 705-715
01 Jul 2025
PMID: 39824599
url
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-334514View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences & Neurology Science & Technology Psychiatry Surgery
Background We investigated the effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence, health and well-being of people with dementia, family carer outcomes and costs.Method A multicentre pragmatic parallel-arm randomised controlled trial compared I-HARP to usual care in community-dwelling people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers in Sydney, Australia (2018-2022). I-HARP is a 4-month, home-based, dementia rehabilitation model delivered by an interdisciplinary team. Assessments were conducted at baseline (time-1), 4-month (time-2) and 12-month (time-3) follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the client's functional independence using the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale at time-2, based on intention-to-treat analyses.Result Of 130 recruited client-carer dyads, 116 dyads (58/group) completed the trial. The I-HARP group were not significantly better in most outcome measures than usual care at both time-2 and time-3; with the only statistically significant difference being a reduction in home environment hazards at time-2. Post hoc subgroup analysis of 66 clients with mild dementia found significantly better functional independence in the intervention group compared with those in usual care: difference 8.99 on DAD (95% CI 1.21, 16.79) at time-2 and difference 12.16 (95% CI 1.93, 22.38) at time-3. Economic evaluation suggests potentially lower resource use in I-HARP compared with usual care, but the cost-effectiveness is uncertain.Conclusion Primary outcomes were not met for a population of people with dementia, with severity ranging from mild to moderate and severe. The I-HARP model appeared to benefit functional independence of participants with mild dementia, with potential cost savings.Trial registration number ACTRN12618000600246.

Metrics

3 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery
Logo image