Logo image
Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Adam Perlman, Susan Gould Fogerite, Oliver Glass, Elizabeth Bechard, Ather Ali, Valentine Y. Njike, Carl Pieper, Natalia O. Dmitrieva, Alison Luciano, Lisa Rosenberger, …
Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, v 34(3), pp 379-386
01 Mar 2019
PMID: 30543021
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4763-5View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

General & Internal Medicine Health Care Sciences & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, General & Internal Science & Technology
BackgroundCurrent treatment options for knee osteoarthritis have limited effectiveness and potentially adverse side effects. Massage may offer a safe and effective complement to the management of knee osteoarthritis.ObjectiveExamine effects of whole-body massage on knee osteoarthritis, compared to active control (light-touch) and usual care.DesignMultisite RCT assessing the efficacy of massage compared to light-touch and usual care in adults with knee osteoarthritis, with assessments at baseline and weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 52. Subjects in massage or light-touch groups received eight weekly treatments, then were randomized to biweekly intervention or usual care to week 52. The original usual care group continued to week 24. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.ParticipantsFive hundred fifty-one screened for eligibility, 222 adults with knee osteoarthritis enrolled, 200 completed 8-week assessments, and 175 completed 52-week assessments.InterventionSixty minutes of protocolized full-body massage or light-touch.Main MeasuresPrimary: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. Secondary: visual analog pain scale, PROMIS Pain Interference, knee range of motion, and timed 50-ft walk.Key ResultsAt 8weeks, massage significantly improved WOMAC Global scores compared to light-touch (-8.16, 95% CI=-13.50 to -2.81) and usual care (-9.55, 95% CI=-14.66 to -4.45). Additionally, massage improved pain, stiffness, and physical function WOMAC subscale scores compared to light-touch (p<0.001; p=0.04; p=0.02, respectively) and usual care (p<0.001; p=0.002; p=0.002; respectively). At 52weeks, the omnibus test of any group difference in the change in WOMAC Global from baseline to 52weeks was not significant (p=0.707, df=3), indicating no significant difference in change across groups. Adverse events were minimal.ConclusionsEfficacy of symptom relief and safety of weekly massage make it an attractive short-term treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Longer-term biweekly dose maintained improvement, but did not provide additional benefit beyond usual care post 8-week treatment.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT01537484

Metrics

10 Record Views
52 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image