Logo image
Efficiency enhancements in micellar liquid chromatography through selection of stationary phase and alcohol modifier
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Efficiency enhancements in micellar liquid chromatography through selection of stationary phase and alcohol modifier

David P Thomas and Joe P Foley
Journal of Chromatography A, v 1149(2)
2007
PMID: 17418227
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257528View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

MLC Chromatographic efficiency Large-pore columns Column temperature effects on efficiency Perfluorinated stationary phase Micellar liquid chromatography Diffusion coefficient Taylor-Aris Reduced parameter plots
Micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) remains hindered by reduced chromatographic efficiency compared to reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) using hydro-organic mobile phases. The reduced efficiency has been partially explained by the adsorption of surfactant monomers onto the stationary phase, resulting in a slow mass transfer of the analyte within the interfacial region of the mobile phase and stationary phase. Using an array of 12 columns, the effects of various bonded stationary phases and silica pore sizes, including large-pore short alkyl chain, non-porous, superficially porous and perfluorinated, were evaluated to determine their impact on efficiency in MLC. Additionally, each stationary phase was evaluated using 1-propanol and 1-butanol as separate micellar mobile phase alcohol additives, with several columns also evaluated using 1-pentanol. A simplified equation for calculation of A′ and C′ terms from reduced plate height ( h) versus reduced velocity ( ν) plots was used to compare the efficiency data obtained with the different columns and mobile phases. Analyte diffusion coefficients needed for the h versus ν plots were determined by the Taylor-Aris dispersion technique. The use of a short alkyl chain, wide-pore silica column, specifically, Nucleosil C4, 1000 Å, was shown to have the most improved efficiency when using a micellar mobile phase compared to a hydro-organic mobile phase for all columns evaluated. The use of 1-propanol was also shown to provide improved efficiency over 1-butanol or 1-pentanol in most cases. In a second series of experiments, column temperatures were varied from 40 to 70 °C to determine the effect of temperature on efficiency for a subset of the stationary phases. Efficiency improvements ranging from 9% for a Chromegabond C8 column to 58% for a Zorbax ODS column were observed over the temperature range. Based on these observed improvements, higher column temperatures may often yield significant gains in column efficiency, assuming the column is thermally stable.

Metrics

5 Record Views
25 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Biochemical Research Methods
Chemistry, Analytical
Logo image