Logo image
Electronic Health Records in Epidemiology: Appropriate Questions, Common Biases, and Potential Sensitivity Analyses
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Electronic Health Records in Epidemiology: Appropriate Questions, Common Biases, and Potential Sensitivity Analyses

Neal Goldstein
Current epidemiology reports, v 12(1), 11
05 Jun 2025
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-025-00365-7View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2025CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Electronic health records Validity Clinical research Natural language processing Quantitative bias analysis
Purpose Electronic health record (EHR) data have become essential and commonplace in epidemiological and clinical research. In this narrative review on the use of EHR data in epidemiology, I discuss appropriate research questions, common biases, and potential sensitivity analyses focusing on recent work that has been done to improve the internal and external validity of EHR-based studies. Recent Findings An appropriate research question addresses issues of EHR-data availability and accessibility, while patient selection forces into healthcare may result in a sample that lacks representativeness. Natural language processing tools are becoming widespread and tailored to EHR use for operationalizing unstructured data. Common biases identified in the literature include misclassification and measurement error, informed presence bias, selection bias and sampling error, and residual confounding. Summary EHR data are unlike other observational data sources and carry assumptions about patient selection and clinical documentation that can impact the validity of the analyses. Potential sensitivity analyses including quantitative bias analysis can help to understand the impact of one or more of these biases on the study findings.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image