Logo image
Encoding of stimulus frequency and sensor motion in the posterior medial thalamic nucleus
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Encoding of stimulus frequency and sensor motion in the posterior medial thalamic nucleus

Radi Masri, Tatiana Bezdudnaya, Jason C Trageser and Asaf Keller
Journal of neurophysiology, v 100(2), pp 681-689
01 Aug 2008
PMID: 18234976
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2652137View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Action Potentials - physiology Action Potentials - radiation effects Afferent Pathways - drug effects Afferent Pathways - physiology Animals Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Electric Stimulation - methods Electromyography Female Midline Thalamic Nuclei - cytology Midline Thalamic Nuclei - physiology Motion Neurons - physiology Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Reaction Time - physiology Vibrissae - innervation Wakefulness
In all sensory systems, information is processed along several parallel streams. In the vibrissa-to-barrel cortex system, these include the lemniscal system and the lesser-known paralemniscal system. The posterior medial nucleus (POm) is the thalamic structure associated with the latter pathway. Previous studies suggested that POm response latencies are positively correlated with stimulation frequency and negatively correlated with response duration, providing a basis for a phase locked loop-temporal decoding of stimulus frequency. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing response latencies of POm neurons, in both awake and anesthetized rats, to vibrissae deflections at frequencies between 0.3 and 11 Hz. We found no significant, systematic correlation between stimulation frequency and the latency or duration of POm responses. We obtained similar findings from recording in awake rats, in rats under different anesthetics, and in anesthetized rats in which the reticular activating system was stimulated. These findings suggest that stimulus frequency is not reliably reflected in response latency of POm neurons. We also tested the hypothesis that POm neurons respond preferentially to sensor motion, that is, they respond to whisking in air, without contacts. We recorded from awake, head-restrained rats while monitoring vibrissae movements. All POm neurons responded to passive whisker deflections, but none responded to noncontact whisking. Thus like their counterparts in the trigeminal ganglion, POm neurons may not reliably encode whisking kinematics. These observations suggest that POm neurons might not faithfully encode vibrissae inputs to provide reliable information on vibrissae movements or contacts.

Metrics

10 Record Views
53 citations in Scopus
102 readers on Mendeley
1 readers on CiteULike

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Neurosciences
Physiology
Logo image