Logo image
Endometrial ablation devices: Review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Endometrial ablation devices: Review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database

Carl Della Badia, Paul Nyirjesy and Ata Atogho
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, v 14(4), pp 436-441
01 Jul 2007
PMID: 17630160

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Obstetrics & Gynecology Science & Technology
Our objective was to evaluate complications reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database and to look for trends of complications among various endometrial ablation devices. This database was not intended to be used either to evaluate rates of adverse events or to compare adverse event occurrence rates across devices. We performed a retrospective review of the Food and Drug Administration's MAUDE database. The database was queried for adverse events associated with the use of endometrial ablation devices. The following data were collected: event number, date reported, date of occurrence, type of ablation device, type of complication, adherence to manufacturer's protocol, brief description, disposition, who reported incident, report source, and cause of problem. The total number of adverse events reported in the United States for the time period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006, was 254. The largest number of major complications for cryoablation was bowel injury (n = 5), for microwave was bowel injury (n = 6), for hot water balloon was complications leading to hysterectomy (n = 7), for free circulating hot water was severe burns (n = 22), and for bipolar mesh was bowel injury (n = 19). The MAUDE database is useful to both the physician and manufacturer to look at trends and types of complications. (C) 2007 AAGL. All rights reserved.

Metrics

12 Record Views
43 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Logo image