Logo image
Epidemiological risk factors for clinical malaria infection in the highlands of Western Kenya
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Epidemiological risk factors for clinical malaria infection in the highlands of Western Kenya

Walters M Essendi, Anne M Vardo-Zalik, Eugenia Lo, Maxwell G Machani, Guofa Zhou, Andrew K Githeko, Guiyun Yan and Yaw A Afrane
Malaria journal, v 18(1), pp 211-7
24 Jun 2019
PMID: 31234879
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2845-4View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Adolescent Adult Animals Case-Control Studies Child Child, Preschool Culicidae - physiology Female Housing - statistics & numerical data Humans Infant Insecticide-Treated Bednets Kenya - epidemiology Logistic Models Malaria - epidemiology Malaria - prevention & control Male Mosquito Control - standards Population Density Risk Factors
Understanding the complex heterogeneity of risk factors that can contribute to an increased risk of malaria at the individual and household level will enable more effective use of control measures. The objective of this study was to understand individual and household factors that influence clinical malaria infection among individuals in the highlands of Western Kenya. This was a matched case-control study undertaken in the Western Kenya highlands. Clinical malaria cases were recruited from health facilities and matched to asymptomatic individuals from the community who served as controls. Each participant was screened for malaria using microscopy. Follow-up surveys were conducted with individual households to collect socio-economic data. The houses were also checked using pyrethrum spray catches to collect mosquitoes. A total of 302 malaria cases were matched to 604 controls during the surveillance period. Mosquito densities were similar in the houses of both groups. A greater percentage of people in the control group (64.6%) used insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) compared to the families of malaria cases (48.3%). Use of ITNs was associated with lower level of clinical malaria episodes (odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.39-0.68; P < 0.0001). Low income was the most important factor associated with higher malaria infections (adj. OR 4.70). Use of malaria prophylaxis was the most important factor associated with less malaria infections (adj OR 0.36). Mother's (not fathers) employment status (adj OR 0.48) and education level (adj OR 0.54) was important malaria risk factor. Houses with open eaves was an important malaria risk factor (adj OR 1.72). The identification of risk factors for clinical malaria infection provides information on the local malaria epidemiology and has the potential to lead to a more effective and targeted use of malaria control measures. These risk factors could be used to assess why some individuals acquire clinical malaria whilst others do not and to inform how intervention could be scaled at the local level.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Infectious Diseases
Parasitology
Tropical Medicine
Logo image