Logo image
Estimating county-level tobacco use and exposure in South Carolina: a spatial model-based small area estimation approach
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Estimating county-level tobacco use and exposure in South Carolina: a spatial model-based small area estimation approach

Jan M. Eberth, Alexander C. McLain, Yuan Hong, Erica Sercy, Abdoulaye Diedhiou and Daniel J. Kilpatrick
Annals of epidemiology, v 28(7), pp 481-488
Jul 2018
PMID: 29685650

Abstract

Adult Small area estimation Smoking Surveys and Questionnaires Tobacco
Local health statistics are increasingly requested for policy-making and programmatic purposes; however, population-based surveys are often inadequate to support direct estimation for small areas. Model-based estimation techniques can be used to create local estimates for public health outcomes. Using the 2014–2015 South Carolina (SC) Adult Tobacco Survey, we examined tobacco-related outcomes at the county level using a spatial multilevel, poststratification approach. To create county-level tobacco estimates, we used a two-level model with a spatially intrinsic conditional autoregressive random intercept. Stratum-specific (race, age, and sex) estimates for each county were then created and averaged based on population data obtained from the U.S. Census. The estimated prevalence of current smoking in SC counties among adults ranged from 7.4% to 35.1%, and the percentage reporting ever trying an e-cigarette ranged from 4.2% to 30.2%. Model validation showed considerable agreement between direct and indirect estimates (Pearson and Spearman correlations all >0.75) that varied by the sample size of the outcome, as hypothesized. Data from the SC Adult Tobacco Survey were used to develop county-level estimates of multiple tobacco-related outcomes using a spatial multilevel, poststratification approach. The results showed heterogeneity in smoking behaviors across the state along with marked spatial correlation.

Metrics

10 Record Views
8 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#10 Reduced Inequalities
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image