Logo image
Estimation of averages in truncated samples
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Estimation of averages in truncated samples

Charles Haas and Peter Scheff
Environmental science & technology, v 24(6), pp 912-919
01 Jan 1990

Abstract

Environment Errors Estimators
This paper compares methodologies for the estimation of the mean of a series of observations that contain results below a known detection limit. The bias-corrected restricted maximum likelihood method, not previously employed in environmental science and engineering, is found to be the least biased estimator, with a mean square error only slightly greater than the ordinary maximum likelihood method. This method is more robust to a variety of deviations from normality and, in particular, is better than either graphical or half detection limit methods, in most cases. It is also somewhat easier to compute than the maximum likelihood method.

Metrics

7 Record Views
113 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Environmental
Environmental Sciences
Logo image