Logo image
Evaluating the Impact of Possible Dependencies on Architecture-level Maintainability
Journal article

Evaluating the Impact of Possible Dependencies on Architecture-level Maintainability

Wuxia Jin, Dinghong Zhong, Yuanfang Cai, Rick Kazman and Ting Liu
IEEE transactions on software engineering, pp 1-1
28 Apr 2022

Abstract

Annotations Codes Computer architecture dynamic typing empirical study Java possible dependency Python Software architecture Syntactics
Dependencies among software entities are the foundation for much of the research on software architecture analysis and architecture analysis tools. Dynamically typed languages, such as Python, JavaScript, and Ruby, tolerate the lack of explicit type references, making certain dependencies indiscernible by a purely syntactic analysis of source code. We call these \emph{possible dependencies}, in contrast with the \emph{explicit dependencies} that are directly manifested in source code. We find that existing architecture analysis tools have not taken possible dependencies into consideration. An important question therefore is: \emph{to what extent will these missing possible dependencies impact architecture analysis} To answer this question, we conducted a study of 499 open-source Python projects, employing type inference techniques and type hint practices to discern possible dependencies. We investigated the consequences of possible dependencies in three software maintenance contexts, including capturing co-change relations recorded in revision history, measuring architectural maintainability, and detecting architecture anti-patterns that violate design principles and impact maintainability. Our study revealed that the maintainability impact of possible dependencies is substantial---higher than that of explicit dependencies. Our findings suggest that architecture analysis and tools should take into account, assess, and highlight the impacts of possible dependencies caused by dynamic typing.

Metrics

11 Record Views
9 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Software Engineering
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Logo image