Logo image
Evaluating the quality of the 1000 genomes project data
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluating the quality of the 1000 genomes project data

Saurabh Belsare, Michal Levy-Sakin, Yulia Mostovoy, Steffen Durinck, Subhra Chaudhuri, Ming Xiao, Andrew S. Peterson, Pui-Yan Kwok, Somasekar Seshagiri and Jeffrey D. Wall
BMC genomics, v 20(1), pp 620-620
16 Aug 2019
PMID: 31416423
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5957-xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology Genetics & Heredity Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology
Background Data from the 1000 Genomes project is quite often used as a reference for human genomic analysis. However, its accuracy needs to be assessed to understand the quality of predictions made using this reference. We present here an assessment of the genotyping, phasing, and imputation accuracy data in the 1000 Genomes project. We compare the phased haplotype calls from the 1000 Genomes project to experimentally phased haplotypes for 28 of the same individuals sequenced using the 10X Genomics platform. Results We observe that phasing and imputation for rare variants are unreliable, which likely reflects the limited sample size of the 1000 Genomes project data. Further, it appears that using a population specific reference panel does not improve the accuracy of imputation over using the entire 1000 Genomes data set as a reference panel. We also note that the error rates and trends depend on the choice of definition of error, and hence any error reporting needs to take these definitions into account. Conclusions The quality of the 1000 Genomes data needs to be considered while using this database for further studies. This work presents an analysis that can be used for these assessments.

Metrics

11 Record Views
41 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
Genetics & Heredity
Logo image