Logo image
Evaluation of the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate brachytherapy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluation of the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate brachytherapy

Yongbok Kim, E. Day Werts, Mark G. Trombetta and Moyed Miften
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v 11(3)
10 Jun 2010
PMID: 20717092
url
https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3228View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

biological effective dose (BED) HDR brachytherapy interfractional BED variation MammoSite Radiation Oncology Physics
The objective of this work is to evaluate the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Dose distributions of 19 patients who received 34 Gy in 10 fractions were evaluated. A method was employed to account for nonuniform dose distribution in the BED calculation. Furthermore, a range of α/β values was utilized for specific clinical end points: fibrosis, telangiectasia, erythema, desquamation and breast carcinoma. Two scenarios were simulated to calculate the BED value using: i) the same dose distribution of fraction 1 over fractions 2–10 (constant case, CC), and ii) the actual delivered dose distribution for each fraction 1–10 (interfraction dose variation case, IVC). Although the average BED difference (IVC – CC) was < 0.7 Gy for all clinical endpoints, the range of difference for fibrosis and telangiectasia reached − 11 % to + 3 % and − 9 % to + 9 % for one of the patients, respectively. By disregarding high inhomogeneity in HDR brachytherapy, the conventional BED calculation tends to overestimate the BED for fibrosis by 16% on average, while it underestimates the BED for erythema (7.6%) and desquamation (10.2%). In conclusion, the BED calculation accounting for the nonuniform dose distribution provides a more clinically relevant description of the clinical delivered dose. Though the average BED difference was clinically insignificant, the maximum difference of BED for late effects can differ by a single fractional dose (10%) for a specific patient due to the interfraction dose variation in MammoSite treatment. PACS number: 87.53.Jw

Metrics

3 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image