Logo image
Back
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) in paediatric cutaneous lupus among paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) in paediatric cutaneous lupus among paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists

C.J. Kushner, M. Tarazi, R.G. Gaffney, R. Feng, K. Ardalan, H.A. Brandling-Bennett, L. Castelo-Soccio, J.C. Chang, Y.E. Chiu, S. Gmuca, …
British journal of dermatology (1951), v 180(1), pp 165-171
Jan 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17012
PMID: 30604554
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17012View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Summary Background The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) is a reliable outcome measure for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in adults used in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in children, limiting clinical trials for paediatric CLE. Objectives This study aimed to validate the CLASI in paediatrics. Methods Eleven paediatric patients with CLE, six dermatologists and six rheumatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the CLASI and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and individually rated all patients using both tools. Each physician reassessed two randomly selected patients. Within each physician group, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of each measure. Results CLASI activity scores demonstrated excellent inter‐ and intrarater reliability (ICC > 0·90), while the PGA activity scores had good inter‐rater reliability (ICC 0·73–0·77) among both specialties. PGA activity scores showed excellent (ICC 0·89) and good intrarater reliability (ICC 0·76) for dermatologists and rheumatologists, respectively. Limitations of this study include the small sample size of patients and potential recall bias during the physician rerating session. Conclusions CLASI activity measurement showed excellent inter‐ and intrarater reliability in paediatric CLE and superiority over the PGA. These results demonstrate that the CLASI is a reliable and valid outcome instrument for paediatric CLE. What's already known about this topic? The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) has been established as a reliable outcome measure for CLE in adults and is used in clinical trials. What does this study add? This study validates the reliability of the CLASI in the paediatric population with CLE, which can manifest differently from CLE in adults. This validation will allow clinical trials to assess treatment efficacy reliably in CLE. Linked Comment: Chong. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:20–21. Plain language summary available online Respond to this article

Metrics

18 Record Views
15 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Dermatology
Logo image