Logo image
Federal Hiring Dysfunction and the Self-Shrinking Skew
Journal article   Open access

Federal Hiring Dysfunction and the Self-Shrinking Skew

Lindsey Barrett
The American University law review, v 75(5), pp 1137-1218
2026
pdf
Federal Hiring Dysfunction1.12 MBDownloadView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Access Open Access (License Unspecified)
url
Federal Hiring Dysfunction and the Self-Shrinking SkewView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open Open Access (License Unspecified)

Abstract

Consumer protection Fixation Hiring Innovations Legitimacy Narratives Neoliberalism Oligarchy Political power Politics Private sector Recruitment Reforms Tactics Civil Service Employees Political Economy Public Administration Public Health Regulation
A half-century of remodeling agency workforces against corporate blueprints has hollowed out the civil service, enervated oversight, and facilitated the rise of tech oligarchy. Progressive commenters have criticized the neoliberal turn and proposed reinvigorating reforms, but they’ve overlooked a foundational obstacle: federal hiring dysfunction. Hiring dysfunction entrenches low-resource, deferential regulatory tactics, makes sharper or more onerous approaches less feasible, and undermines recruitment of technical staff for policy and regulatory functions. Concerns about hiring dysfunction and capacity dampen regulatory ambitions. Finally, hiring dysfunction creates plausible-seeming capacity pretexts to oppose novel or more confrontational tactics. Cumulatively, hiring dysfunction cements regulatory dismantlement. Prominent federal hiring critiques evangelize private sector hiring strategies and tie agencies’ precarious political legitimacy to their adoption. This Article is the first to filter those critiques through a law and political economy lens, which illustrates their contributions to what I call federal hiring’s “self-shrinking skew”—a fixation with containing agency discretion that drives brittle procedures and erratic hiring outcomes, even when hiring is highly prioritized. Current hiring approaches cannot replenish razed workforces, and reliance on them will imperil valiant efforts to upend neoliberalism’s crabbed regulatory tactics. Progressive efforts to reoxygenate the regulatory state and facilitate sharper confrontations with tech oligarchy must therefore grapple with federal hiring dysfunction and reject the extractive ideologies that perpetuate it.

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
1 Record Views

Details

Logo image