Logo image
Fuels and Chemicals from Equine-Waste-Derived Tail Gas Reactive Pyrolysis Oil: Technoeconomic Analysis, Environmental and Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Fuels and Chemicals from Equine-Waste-Derived Tail Gas Reactive Pyrolysis Oil: Technoeconomic Analysis, Environmental and Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment

Yetunde E. Sorunmu, Pieter Billen, Yaseen Elkasabi, Charles A. Mullen, Nelson A. Macken, Akwasi A. Boateng and Sabrina Spatari
ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, v 5(10), pp 8804-8814
01 Oct 2017
url
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01609View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Chemistry Chemistry, Multidisciplinary Engineering Engineering, Chemical Green & Sustainable Science & Technology Physical Sciences Science & Technology Science & Technology - Other Topics Technology
Horse manure, the improper disposal of which, imposes considerable environmental costs, constitutes an apt feedstock for conversion to renewable fuels and chemicals when tail gas reactive pyrolysis (TGRP) is employed. TGRP is a modification of fast pyrolysis that recycles its noncondensable gases and produces a bio-oil low in oxygen concentration and rich in naphthalene. Herein, we evaluate the coproduction of phenol as a value-added renewable chemical, alongside jet-range fuels within distributed TGRP systems using techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. We investigate the metrics global warming potential (GWP), cumulative exergy demand (CExD), and cost for the conversion of 200 dry metric tons per day of horse manure to bio-oil and its subsequent upgrade to hydrocarbon fuel and phenolic chemicals. Assigning credits for the offset of the coproducts, the net GWP and CExD of TGRP jet fuel are 10 g of CO2 eq and 0.4 MJ per passenger kilometer distance traveled, respectively. These values are considerably lower than the GWP and CExD of petroleum-based aviation fuel. The minimum fuel selling price of the TGRP jet fuel ($1.35-$1.80 L-1) is estimated to be much greater than that of petroleum-based aviation fuel ($0.42 L-1), except under optimized fuel conversion and coproduct market conditions ($0.53-$0.79 L-1) when including a market price for carbon.

Metrics

1 Record Views
35 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#7 Affordable and Clean Energy

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Chemistry, Multidisciplinary
Engineering, Chemical
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Logo image