Journal article
Further action toward valid science in Law and Human Behavior: Requiring open data, analytic code, and research materials
Law and human behavior, v 46(6), pp 395-397
Dec 2022
PMID: 36521111
Abstract
In 2019, the inaugural editorial of
promised a measured approach to increasing transparency, openness, and replicability practices in the journal. Now, 3 years later, and on the brink of the present authors' last year as the editorial team, it seems only fitting that they take further action to bolster the validity of science published in the journal by requiring that authors openly report data, analytic code, and research materials. The purpose of this editorial is to briefly outline
's new requirements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Further action toward valid science in Law and Human Behavior: Requiring open data, analytic code, and research materials
- Creators
- Bradley D McAuliff - California State University, NorthridgeDavid DeMatteo - Drexel UniversityJennifer Cox - University of AlabamaJennifer S Hunt - University of KentuckyLora M Levett - Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, University of FloridaKyle C Scherr - Central Michigan University
- Publication Details
- Law and human behavior, v 46(6), pp 395-397
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology); Thomas R. Kline School of Law
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000899000200002
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85144178448
- Other Identifier
- 991020531859804721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Law
- Psychology, Social