Journal article
Futility: Unilateral decision making is not the default for pediatric intensivists
Pediatric critical care medicine, v 13(5), pp E311-E315
01 Sep 2012
PMID: 22760427
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Objective: Many hospitals have established medical futility policies allowing a physician to withdraw or withhold treatment considered futile against families' wishes, although little is known on how these policies are used. The goal of our study was to elucidate the perspective of pediatric critical care physicians on futility.
Methods: We sent an anonymous survey to all active members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Critical Care, using Survey Monkey (http://www.surveymonkey.com) as the questionnaire tool. The survey included four clinical vignettes where families desired care that could be perceived as futile care. In each scenario, participants were asked if they would go against the families' wishes and how they would resolve the conflict.
Results: There were 266 of 618 (43%) respondents. For an infant with severe hypoxic ischemic injury and intestinal failure, the majority of physicians (83.7%) would not enact a unilateral donotattemptresuscitation order. For an oncology patient with multiorgan system failure and encephalopathy, the majority (90.4%) would not enact a unilateral donotattemptresuscitation. In the case where a child was declared brain dead, 54.3% of physicians would support unilateral donotattemptresuscitation, yet a third (33.1%) would continue mechanical ventilation. In the case of cardiac surgery for a patient with trisomy 13, the majority (67.1%) would not advocate for surgery. In most scenarios, intensivists cited consultation from the ethics committee (53.8%-76.6%) as the most appropriate way to resolve the conflict. Qualitative data revealed intensivists would prefer to honor families' wishes and utilize time with support from a multidisciplinary team rather than unilateral do not attempt resuscitation to resolve these conflicts.
Conclusions: The majority of pediatric intensivists are not in support of unilateral do-not-attempt resuscitation or withholding care against families' wishes for a variety of reasons. Given this understandable reluctance on the part of the physicians for enforcing decisions, providing unqualified support to families at this difficult time is imperative. Further research is needed to facilitate decision making that respects the moral integrity of families and physicians. (Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012;13:e311-e315)
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Futility: Unilateral decision making is not the default for pediatric intensivists
- Creators
- Kavita Morparia - Einstein Medical Center PhiladelphiaMindy Dickerman - St Christophers Hosp Children, Philadelphia, PA 19133 USAK. Sarah Hoehn - Rush Univ, Coll Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
- Publication Details
- Pediatric critical care medicine, v 13(5), pp E311-E315
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Number of pages
- 5
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Pediatrics
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000308537800007
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-84866399297
- Other Identifier
- 991019168084204721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pediatrics