Logo image
Back
Gazing at the stars is not enough, look at the specific word entropy, too
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Gazing at the stars is not enough, look at the specific word entropy, too

Jorge E. Fresneda and David Gefen
Information & management, v 57(8), 103388
Dec 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103388

Abstract

Ecommerce Latent semantic analysis Online consumer reviews Review helpfulness Text-mining
The helpfulness of online reviews depends on their textual portion. Using the information provided by the seller as a baseline, this study applies latent semantic analysis (LSA) to assess what parts of that textual portion contribute to helpfulness by separating the text into three categories of high entropy words: (1) unique (i.e. does not appear in previous reviews) corroboration entropy, (2) recommendation entropy, and (3) unique opinion entropy. Unique corroboration entropy is calculated based on the number of words in this review that describe the product on the seller’s site, confirming the seller’s claims, which did not appear in previous reviews. Recommendation entropy is based on the number of words that are associated with explicit recommendations. Unique opinion, referred as “regular opinions” in the literature, entropy is based on the number of all the other words in the review that provide positive or negative evaluations of products as well as other additional informational elements that did not appear in previous reviews. The results show that both recommendation and unique opinion entropies (only marginally) increase review helpfulness evaluations, while greater unique corroboration entropy is insignificant.

Metrics

12 Record Views
21 citations in Web of Science
22 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Information Systems
Information Science & Library Science
Management
Logo image