Logo image
Gemini Near Infrared Spectrograph–Distant Quasar Survey: The Chandra View
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Gemini Near Infrared Spectrograph–Distant Quasar Survey: The Chandra View

Andrea Marlar, Ohad Shemmer, Michael Brotherton, Gordon Richards, Dix Cooper, Brandon Matthews, W Brandt and R Plotkin
The Astrophysical journal, v 991(1), 91
01 Sep 2025
url
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adf4ddView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Accretion Luminosity Near infrared radiation Parameters Quasars Robustness X ray sources X ray spectra X-ray fluxes X-rays
We present Chandra observations of 63 sources from the Gemini Near Infrared Spectrograph−Distant Quasar Survey, of which 54 were targeted by snapshot observations in Cycle 24. A total of 55 sources are clearly detected in at least one X-ray band, and we set stringent upper limits on the X-ray fluxes of the remaining eight sources. In combination with rest-frame ultraviolet–optical spectroscopic data for these sources, we assess whether X-rays can provide a robust accretion rate indicator for quasars, particularly at the highest accessible redshifts. We utilize a recently modified Hβ-based Eddington luminosity ratio estimator, as well as the C iv λ1549 emission-line parameter space, to investigate trends and correlations with the optical–X-ray spectral slope (αox) and the effective hard X-ray power-law photon index (Γ). We find that αox does not improve current accretion rate estimates based on Hβ or C iv. Instead, within the limitations of our sample, we confirm previous findings that the C iv parameter space may be a better indicator of the accretion rate up to z ∼ 3.5. We also find that the average Γ values for a small subset of our sources, as well as the average Γ value in different groupings of our sources, are consistent with their respective relatively high Eddington luminosity ratios. Deeper X-ray observations of our X-ray-detected sources are needed for measuring Γ accurately and testing whether this parameter can serve as a robust, unbiased accretion rate diagnostic.

Metrics

4 Record Views

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Logo image