Journal article
Gerrymandering and the Packing and Cracking of Medical Uninsurance Rates in the United States
Journal of public health management and practice, Vol.30(6), pp.832-843
Nov 2024
PMID: 39190647
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Context:Technological innovation and access to big data have allowed partisan gerrymandering to increase dramatically in recent redistricting cycles.Objective:To understand whether and how partisan gerrymandering, including "packing" and "cracking" (ie, respectively concentrating within or dividing specified social groups across political boundaries), distorts understanding of public health need when health statistics are calculated for congressional districts (CDs).Design:Cross-sectional study using 2020 CDs and nonpartisan simulated districts.Setting:United States, 2017-2021.Participants:United States residents.Main Outcome Measure:Percent with no medical insurance (uninsured), within-district variance of percent uninsured, and between-district variance of percent uninsured.Results:At the state level, states where partisan redistricting plans showed greater evidence of partisan gerrymandering were more likely to contain CDs with more extreme values of uninsurance rates than districts in states with less evidence for gerrymandering (association between z-scores for gerrymandering and between-district variation in uninsurance = 0.25 (-0.04, 0.53), P = .10). Comparing variation in uninsurance rates for observed CDs vs nonpartisan simulated districts across all states with more than 1 CD, in analyses stratified by state gerrymander status (no gerrymander, Democratic gerrymander, and Republican gerrymander), we found evidence of particularly extreme distortion of rates in Republican gerrymandered states, whereby Republican-leaning districts tended to have lower uninsurance rates (the percentage of Republican-leaning districts that were significantly lower than nonpartisan simulated districts was 5.1 times that of Democratic-leaning districts) and Democrat-leaning districts had higher uninsurance rates (the percentage of Democrat-leaning districts that were significantly higher than nonpartisan simulated districts was 3.0 times that of Republican-leaning districts).Conclusions:Partisan gerrymandering can affect determination of CD-level uninsurance rates and distort understanding of public health burdens.
Metrics
1 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Gerrymandering and the Packing and Cracking of Medical Uninsurance Rates in the United States
- Creators
- Tamara Rushovich - Harvard UniversityRachel C. Nethery - Harvard UniversityAriel White - Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNancy Krieger - Harvard University
- Publication Details
- Journal of public health management and practice, Vol.30(6), pp.832-843
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Number of pages
- 12
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Urban Health Collaborative
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001318783200004
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85202571488
- Other Identifier
- 991022052308404721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Public, Environmental & Occupational Health