Logo image
How Do Medical Schools Identify and Remediate Professionalism Lapses in Medical Students? A Study of US and Canadian Medical Schools
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How Do Medical Schools Identify and Remediate Professionalism Lapses in Medical Students? A Study of US and Canadian Medical Schools

Deborah Ziring, Deborah Danoff, Suely Grosseman, Debra Langer, Amanda Esposito, Mian Kouresch Jan, Steven Rosenzweig and Dennis Novack
Academic medicine, v 90(7), pp 913-920
01 Jul 2015
PMID: 25922920
url
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00289View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000737View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Health Care Sciences & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Social Sciences
Purpose Teaching and assessing professionalism is an essential element of medical education, mandated by accrediting bodies. Responding to a call for comprehensive research on remediation of student professionalism lapses, the authors explored current medical school policies and practices. Method In 2012-2013, key administrators at U.S. and Canadian medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education were interviewed via telephone or e-mail. The structured interview questionnaire contained open-ended and closed questions about practices for monitoring student professionalism, strategies for remediating lapses, and strengths and limitations of current systems. The authors employed a mixed-methods approach, using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis based on grounded theory. Results Ninety-three (60.8%) of 153 eligible schools participated. Most (74/93; 79.6%) had specific policies and processes regarding professionalism lapses. Student affairs deans and course/clerkship directors were typically responsible for remediation oversight. Approaches for identifying lapses included incident-based reporting and routine student evaluations. The most common remediation strategies reported by schools that had remediated lapses were mandated mental health evaluation (74/90; 82.2%), remediation assignments (66/90; 73.3%), and professionalism mentoring (66/90; 73.3%). System strengths included catching minor offenses early, emphasizing professionalism schoolwide, focusing on helping rather than punishing students, and assuring transparency and good communication. System weaknesses included reluctance to report (by students and faculty), lack of faculty training, unclear policies, and ineffective remediation. In addition, considerable variability in feedforward processes existed between schools. Conclusions The identified strengths can be used in developing best practices until studies of the strategies' effectiveness are conducted.

Metrics

8 Record Views
71 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image