Logo image
How “Specific” Are Gender-Specific Rehabilitation Needs? An Empirical Analysis
Journal article   Peer reviewed

How “Specific” Are Gender-Specific Rehabilitation Needs? An Empirical Analysis

Kirk Heilbrun, David DeMatteo, Ralph Fretz, Jacey Erickson, Kento Yasuhara and Natalie Anumba
Criminal justice and behavior, v 35(11), pp 1382-1397
Nov 2008

Abstract

community corrections gender-specific rehabilitation criminogenic needs
There has been relatively little empirical research on the distinctive characteristics and needs of female offenders that could help guide rehabilitative approaches that are gender specific. This study considered a sample of female offenders (N = 886) and male offenders (N = 1,435) who had been released from incarceration and provided with assessment services as part of the community reentry process. Comparisons were conducted using the employment, companions, and financial domains of the Level of Service Inventory (LSI-R and LS-CMI). Female offenders received significantly higher ratings in companion and financial deficits, consistent with some prior research suggesting that social and financial risk factors for offending may be more substantial in women. Implications for research and the practice of gender-specific rehabilitation approaches are discussed.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Criminology & Penology
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image