Logo image
How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to political argumentation on Twitter

Katarzyna Elliott-Maksymowicz, Alexander Nikolaev and Douglas Porpora
Humanities & social sciences communications, v 8(1), pp 1-9
14 May 2021
url
https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100001View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00794-xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Arts & Humanities Arts & Humanities - Other Topics Humanities, Multidisciplinary Social Sciences Social Sciences - Other Topics Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Besides Donald Trump, its most famous user, some 330 million people use Twitter as a platform for communication, much of it political. Yet, given the 280 character limit, how much can you say in a tweet? Although much has already been written about Twitter, little attention has been given to the nature of the argument found there. To begin filling this gap, it is necessary to identify the basic units of such an argument. Identifying them as speech acts, we demonstrate here by discourse analysis how by virtue of the enthymematic quality of public argument, much argument can be communicated even by singular speech acts and even by speech acts other than assertion.

Metrics

26 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Humanities, Multidisciplinary
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Logo image