Journal article
How the Liberal First Amendment Under-Protects Democracy
Minnesota law review, v 107(2), pp 529-604
2022
Abstract
This Article advances a distinct theoretical account of the First Amendment that stresses its role as the underwriter of a republican form of government. Predicated on a more accurate description of the processes of self-governance, the advanced theory delivers a construction of the First Amendment that actually protects democracy in all its facets. By contrast, as currently construed, the First Amendment operates to the detriment of democracy. A singular preoccupation with speech as the mechanism of self-governance obscures the critical role of political participation as conduct. Accordingly, disruptive assemblies get less protection than disruptive speech, and the Court is blind to the First Amendment interests in its most important election law cases. Meanwhile, in a variety of other contexts, the Court consistently over-protects speech, thereby undermining the capacity of legislatures to serve their most basic constitutional function—reaching provisional decisions on contested values. Taken together, these missteps result in a construction of the First Amendment that undermines democracy at a moment when American democratic institutions, and the First Amendment itself, are under extreme political pressure. Properly construed, the First Amendment can do better.
Metrics
29 File views/ downloads
24 Record Views
Details
- Title
- How the Liberal First Amendment Under-Protects Democracy
- Creators
- Tabatha Abu El-Haj - Drexel University, Thomas R. Kline School of Law
- Publication Details
- Minnesota law review, v 107(2), pp 529-604
- Number of pages
- 77
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Thomas R. Kline School of Law
- Other Identifier
- 991021899515504721